You are currently looking at the v11.0 docs, which are still a work in progress. If you miss anything, you may find it in the older v10.0 docs here.
Null, Undefined and Option
ReScript itself doesn't have the notion of null
or undefined
. This is a great thing, as it wipes out an entire category of bugs. No more undefined is not a function
, and cannot access someAttribute of undefined
!
However, the concept of a potentially nonexistent value is still useful, and safely exists in our language.
We represent the existence and nonexistence of a value by wrapping it with the option
type. Here's its definition from the standard library:
It means "a value of type option is either None (representing nothing) or that actual value wrapped in a Some".
Note how the option
type is just a regular variant.
Example
Here's a normal value:
To represent the concept of "maybe null", you'd turn this into an option
type by wrapping it. For the sake of a more illustrative example, we'll put a condition around it:
Later on, when another piece of code receives such value, it'd be forced to handle both cases through pattern matching:
By turning your ordinary number into an option
type, and by forcing you to handle the None
case, the language effectively removed the possibility for you to mishandle, or forget to handle, a conceptual null
value! A pure ReScript program doesn't have null errors.
Interoperate with JavaScript undefined
and null
The option
type is common enough that we special-case it when compiling to JavaScript:
simply compiles down to 5
, and
compiles to undefined
! If you've got e.g. a string in JavaScript that you know might be undefined
, type it as option<string>
and you're done! Likewise, you can send a Some(5)
or None
to the JS side and expect it to be interpreted correctly =)
Caveat 1
The option-to-undefined translation isn't perfect, because on our side, option
values can be composed:
This still compiles to 5
, but this gets troublesome:
What's this Caml_option.some
thing? Why can't this compile to undefined
? Long story short, when dealing with a polymorphic option
type (aka option<'a>
, for any 'a
), many operations become tricky if we don't mark the value with some special annotation. If this doesn't make sense, don't worry; just remember the following rule:
Never, EVER, pass a nested
option
value (e.g.Some(Some(Some(5)))
) into the JS side.Never, EVER, annotate a value coming from JS as
option<'a>
. Always give the concrete, non-polymorphic type.
Caveat 2
Unfortunately, lots of times, your JavaScript value might be both null
or undefined
. In that case, you unfortunately can't type such value as e.g. option<int>
, since our option
type only checks for undefined
and not null
when dealing with a None
.
Solution: More Sophisticated undefined
& null
Interop
To solve this, we provide access to more elaborate null
and undefined
helpers through the Js.Nullable
module. This somewhat works like an option
type, but is different from it.
Examples
To create a JS null
, use the value Js.Nullable.null
. To create a JS undefined
, use Js.Nullable.undefined
(you can naturally use None
too, but that's not the point here; the Js.Nullable.*
helpers wouldn't work with it).
If you're receiving, for example, a JS string that can be null
and undefined
, type it as:
To create such a nullable string from our side (presumably to pass it to the JS side, for interop purpose), do:
The return
part "wraps" a string into a nullable string, to make the type system understand and track the fact that, as you pass this value around, it's not just a string, but a string that can be null
or undefined
.
Convert to/from option
Js.Nullable.fromOption
converts from a option
to Js.Nullable.t
. Js.Nullable.toOption
does the opposite.